2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing

6-11 June 2021 • Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Extracting Knowledge from Information

2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing

6-11 June 2021 • Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Extracting Knowledge from Information
Login Paper Search My Schedule Paper Index Help

My ICASSP 2021 Schedule

Note: Your custom schedule will not be saved unless you create a new account or login to an existing account.
  1. Create a login based on your email (takes less than one minute)
  2. Perform 'Paper Search'
  3. Select papers that you desire to save in your personalized schedule
  4. Click on 'My Schedule' to see the current list of selected papers
  5. Click on 'Printable Version' to create a separate window suitable for printing (the header and menu will appear, but will not actually print)

Paper Detail

Paper IDSPCOM-5.1
Paper Title Optimal Detection in the Presence of Non-Gaussian Jamming
Authors Khalid Almahorg, Ramy Gohary, Carleton university, Canada
SessionSPCOM-5: Detection and Decoding
LocationGather.Town
Session Time:Friday, 11 June, 11:30 - 12:15
Presentation Time:Friday, 11 June, 11:30 - 12:15
Presentation Poster
Topic Signal Processing for Communications and Networking: [SPC-MOD] Modulation, demodulation, encoding and decoding
IEEE Xplore Open Preview  Click here to view in IEEE Xplore
Abstract We consider a scenario in which a transmitter sends complex multidimensional symbols to a receiver in the presence of a proactive continuous jammer emitting a zero-mean complex Gaussian signal over an unknown complex Gaussian channel. We develop the optimal maximum likelihood (ML) detector for cases in which the receiver has full channel state information (CSI), full channel distribution information (CDI), or partial CDI about the transmitter channel. The jammer CDI is either partially or fully available at the receiver. We identify cases in which the non-Gaussian signals resulting from the jammer’s transmission can be approximated by Gaussian signals to reduce the computational cost without compromising optimality of detection. Furthermore, we identify cases in which the Gaussian approximation ML detector is not equivalent to the exact ML detector. In these cases, we show that the advantage of the exact ML detector over the Gaussian approximation one can be significant.