2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing

6-11 June 2021 • Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Extracting Knowledge from Information

2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing

6-11 June 2021 • Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Extracting Knowledge from Information

Technical Program

Paper Detail

Paper IDSPE-47.1
Paper Title MULTIPLE-HYPOTHESIS CTC-BASED SEMI-SUPERVISED ADAPTATION OF END-TO-END SPEECH RECOGNITION
Authors Cong-Thanh Do, Rama Doddipatla, Toshiba Europe Limited, United Kingdom; Thomas Hain, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
SessionSPE-47: Speech Recognition 17: Speech Adaptation and Normalization
LocationGather.Town
Session Time:Friday, 11 June, 11:30 - 12:15
Presentation Time:Friday, 11 June, 11:30 - 12:15
Presentation Poster
Topic Speech Processing: [SPE-ADAP] Speech Adaptation/Normalization
IEEE Xplore Open Preview  Click here to view in IEEE Xplore
Virtual Presentation  Click here to watch in the Virtual Conference
Abstract This paper proposes an adaptation method for end-to-end speech recognition. In this method, multiple automatic speech recognition (ASR) 1-best hypotheses are integrated in the computation of the connectionist temporal classification (CTC) loss function. The integration of multiple ASR hypotheses helps alleviating the impact of errors in the ASR hypotheses to the computation of the CTC loss when ASR hypotheses are used. When being applied in semi-supervised adaptation scenarios where part of the adaptation data do not have labels, the CTC loss of the proposed method is computed from different ASR 1-best hypotheses obtained by decoding the unlabeled adaptation data. Experiments are performed in clean and multi-condition training scenarios where the CTC-based end-to-end ASR systems are trained on Wall Street Journal (WSJ) clean training data and CHiME-4 multi-condition training data, respectively, and tested on Aurora-4 test data. The proposed adaptation method yields 6.6% and 5.8% relative word error rate (WER) reductions in clean and multi-condition training scenarios, respectively, compared to a baseline system which is adapted with part of the adaptation data having manual transcriptions using back-propagation fine-tuning.